|
Following several requests for additional research material, we are pleased to present the author's Masters Degree Thesis. Reproduced below are the Abstract and Table of Contents. Please download the PDF document for full contents. Analysis Of Accelerants In Fire Debris By Capillary Gas Liquid Chromatography (1.9M pdf) | ![]() |
| The author running samples in the Geronimo Laboratory, UTS Sydney. |
Analysis Of Accelerants In Fire Debris |
ABSTRACTThe experimental work involved in this project has been aimed at developing an understanding of the problems likely to be encountered during the routine analysis of fire debris where the analytical technique is capable of detecting approximately one microlitre of an accelerant. This high sensitivity is achieved by analysing with Capillary Gas Liquid Chromatography a dynamic headspace extract of the fire debris. Capillary columns are being used more extensively in G.L.C. analysis because of their greater resolving power as compared to packed columns. They have been slowly accepted in routine fire debris analysis but were used exclusively throughout the project and were found to give more information in the chromatograms to aid their interpretation. There has also been reservations about using techniques that are capable of detecting 1 mL of accelerant because of the questions of the normal background levels of the accelerants, the possibility of contamination and the interpretation of the chromatograms and these three areas were investigated. Background levels of accelerants on various materials were monitored, areas where the accidental contamination of the sample is possible were identified and alternative techniques proposed and chromatograms using capillary columns of various accelerants, synthetic and household materials are presented which would aid the interpretation of a samples' chromatogram. The chemical characteristics of these materials were also investigated using specific ion monitoring of the chromatographic analysis. The efforts of the forensic laboratory are reliant on the quality of the samples provided so the suitability of a sampling aid the "Sniffer" was evaluated and the instrument's shortcomings are discussed. Techniques of identifying gas odourants utilising the equipment used for fm debris analysis are also presented which would assist the investigation of explosions. The project also investigated the problems of the analytical discrimination of accelerants when using dynamic headspace analysis which would aid the interpretation of the chromatograms. Static headspace analysis was also examined using Tenax absorption tubes and the method could also be used in the laboratory to enable greater flexibility of operation. TABLE OF CONTENTSABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Arson Investigation CHAPTER 2. THE EXPERIMENTAL WORK OBJECTIVE 2.1 The Extraction Equipment CHAPTER 3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Sampling with a Sniffer CHAPTER 4. CONCLUSIONS BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDIX 1. CHROMATOGRAMS OF THE INDUSTRIAL SOLVENTS LIST OF FIGURES 2.1 Extraction Equipment2.2 Schematic Diagram of Dynamic Headspace Extraction Equipment 3.1 Empty Can Chromatogram 3.2 Lined Can vs. Petrol Chromatograms 3.3 Plastic Bag Chromatogram 3.4 Diesel extracted and sampled at 15, 30, 60 and 90 minutes vs. Diesel Chromatograms 3.5 Thermal and Solvent Desorption of Petrol Chromatograms 3.6 Thermal and Solvent Desorption of Ethanol Chromatograms 3.7 Town Gas Chromatogram 3.8 Soil (Ex Motor Yard) vs. Petrol and Diesel Chromatograms 3.9 Fresh and Evaporated Petrol Chromatograms 3.10 Ion Scans of Petrol Chromatogram 3.11 Lead Scans of Petrol Chromatogram 3.12 Lead Scans of Extracted Petrol Chromatogram 3.13 Leaded and Unleaded Petrol Chromatograms 3.14 Kerosene Chromatogram 3.15 Ion Scans of Kerosene Chromatogram 3.16 Evaporated Kerosene vs. Diesel Chromatograms 3.17 Fresh and Evaporated Mineral Turps Chromatograms 3.18 Ion Scans of Mineral Turps Chromatogram 3.19 Diesel and Evaporated Diesel Chromatograms 3.20 Ion Scans of Diesel Chromatogram 3.21 Floor Tile Glue vs. Petrol Chromatograms 3.22 Varnished Wood vs. Petrol Chromatograms 3.23 Motor Oil vs. Kerosene Chromatograms 3.24 Vegetable Oil and Rancid Oil Chromatograms 3.25 Mortein, WD40 vs. White Spirits Chromatograms 3.26 Burnt Nylon Chromatogram 3.27 Burnt P.V.C Chromatogram 3.28 Ion Scans of Burnt P.V.C Chromatogram 3.29 Burnt Polyethylene vs. Kerosene Chromatograms 3.30 Ion Scans of Burnt Polyethylene Chromatogram 3.31 Burnt Polypropylene Chromatogram 3.32 Burnt Polystyrene Chromatogram 3.33 Ion Scans of Burnt Polystyrene Chromatogram 3.34 Burnt Rubber Backed Carpet vs. Petrol Chromatograms 3.35 Ion Scans of Burnt Rubber Backed Carpet Chromatogram 3.36 Burnt Rubber Floor Tile Chromatogram 3.37 Ion Scans of Burnt Rubber Floor Tile Chromatogram LIST OF TABLES 3.1 Sniffer Responses for 112 Samples3.2 Drager Tube Responses to H2S, T.H.T., T.B.M. and Diluted Town Gas. Download the PDF document for full contents. (Right/Option Clik and select "Save As")
Analysis Of Accelerants In Fire Debris By Capillary Gas Liquid Chromatography (1.9M pdf) |